Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n

October 1, 2007 | 12:02

Tags: #20 #80211n #analysis #benchmarks #ddr3 #deluxe #embedded #heatpipes #n #p5e3 #pci-express #sata #testing #wireless #x16 #x38

Companies: #asus

Audio Performance

The audio performance tests were done using Audio Rightmark 6.0.5 and a 3.5mm gold plated, oxygen free stereo loop back cable between stereo out and microphone input. Results were taken at the DVD sample rate of 16-bit/48KHz and High Definition 24-bit/96KHz.

What we're looking for:

  • Noise Level: A higher negative is better. This is usually viewed in relation to a signal level which provides a signal to noise ratio. As you get closer to zero there's more noise and lesser audio fidelity.
  • Frequency Response: Two values listing how close to the lower higher frequencies the codec can reach. If it hits them perfectly it'll display a 0, 0.
  • Dynamic Range: The difference between the loudest and quietest sounds the codec can make before it distorts them. The larger the gap, the better.
  • THD and IMD percentage: Closer to zero is better. THD and IMD are best looked at together, where as if you have a lot of THD and not much IMD, then it'll offer a warmer accurate sound. High THD and IMD provides a warm, inaccurate sound, low THD and high IMD gives a cold inaccurate sound and finally low THD and IMD gives a cold accurate sound.
  • IMD = intermodulation distortion and is a fancy way of saying conversion interpolation, which is a basic detection of the quality loss after an analogue to digital then digital to analogue conversion. By comparing it to a highly compressed source it shows up problems with the codec and converters.
  • THD = total harmonic distortion, which shows up unwanted harmonics; integer multiples of the original component sound that can be second, third, fourth degrees or overtones for example.
  • Stereo Crosstalk: where the stereo channels "talk" to each other and interact. Ideally you want them entirely separate, unmixed or echoed in either channel, so a higher negative a result as possible is preferred.

16-bit / 48KHz


Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance

Click to enlarge
Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance
Crosstalk, Dynamic Range and Frequency Response
Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance
Intermodulation Distortion, Intermodulation Distortion Swept and Noise Level
Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance
Total Harmonic Distortion

24-bit / 96KHz


Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance

Click to enlarge
Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance
Crosstalk, Dynamic Range and Frequency Response
Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance
Intermodulation Distortion, Intermodulation Distortion Swept and Noise Level
Asus P5E3 Deluxe WiFi-AP @n Subsystem Testing: Audio Performance
Total Harmonic Distortion

Looking at the graphs, the codec's performance at 24-bit / 96KHz is a little more erratic than at 16-bit / 48KHz, but overall it's good to see Asus has sorted itself out and used the ADI SoundMax 1988B chipset well. The implementation on the P5K-series boards was pretty average and one of the worst on-board audio solutions we've tested.
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04